|
|
Post by Geg on Apr 20, 2004 19:51:58 GMT
Firefox:  Thunderbird:  |
|
|
|
Post by Zippy on Apr 20, 2004 21:35:29 GMT
Fully in agreement. It's got more character; you can see the face and it's shaped nicely.
The only thing it loses on is the colour scheme - Firefox is more colourful
|
|
|
|
Post by bob on Apr 20, 2004 21:50:11 GMT
Fully in agreement. It's got more character; you can see the face and it's shaped nicely. The only thing it loses on is the colour scheme - Firefox is more colourful agreed |
|
|
|
Post by Geg on Apr 20, 2004 23:08:25 GMT
The thunderbird isn't clearly missing any limbs either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eat Your Uncle on Apr 21, 2004 8:49:37 GMT
WHAT IS THE FOX DOING TO THE EARTH? MY INNOCENCE, IT'S GONE FOREEEEEVEEEEER....!
|
|
|
|
Post by Geg on Apr 21, 2004 13:47:53 GMT
WHAT IS THE FOX DOING TO THE EARTH? MY INNOCENCE, IT'S GONE FOREEEEEVEEEEER....! For a start, it's not the Earth... or if it is, my geography's shite. Dunno - embracing it? racing around it? Hey, if it's missing legs, I wouldn't bet that it's not missing... errrm... y'know... |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Apr 21, 2004 16:32:10 GMT
anyway it looks more like the birds humping the mail
|
|
|
|
Post by Tassadara C on Apr 25, 2004 23:23:44 GMT
firefox is cuuuute
|
|
|
|
Post by Chenny on Apr 26, 2004 22:24:32 GMT
I'm assuming the rest of the firefox's anatomical partts are in the fire part. Maybe?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tassadara C on Apr 26, 2004 22:46:56 GMT
tho I do have to say after reading American Gods, Thunderbirds are cooler.
|
|
|
|
Post by Geg on Oct 31, 2004 19:42:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Zippy on Nov 5, 2004 1:30:20 GMT
lol hump lol
|
|
